Anger over suggestion that 5,000 new homes could be built near Cowan Bridge

Lancaster And Morecambe Citizen: David Morris MP at the meeting at Cowan Bridge David Morris MP at the meeting at Cowan Bridge

AN MP has added his voice to an outpouring of anger over proposals for 5,000 new homes in a small village.

David Morris, Morecambe and Lunesdale MP, has tabled a Parliamentary motion in support of residents from Cowan Bridge, close to Kirkby Lonsdale, who could see ‘a whole new settlement’ built on their doorsteps.

“I am angry that the city council has plans to build 5,000 homes here,” he said.

“I have tabled a Parliamentary motion in support of the local people whose lives will be devastated if this is allowed to happen.”

The proposal is the last of five options being considered by Lancaster City Council as it attempts to find space for 12,000 new homes by 2031.

MORE TOP STORIES:

A consultation held recently saw residents turn out in their hundreds to express anger at the plan – and Mr Morris said a packed public meeting proved residents were ‘united in opposition’.

He has now taken the fight to Parliament, with a motion which states the option is ‘wholly unsuitable’ for the area.

Other options being considered by the council inc-lude a single large urban extension, a review of the green belt, development throughout the district’s towns and villages or a large-scale expansion of two villages. Results of the consultation are expected to be published in September.

However, residents will have to wait a year before they will find out whether the plan has been shelved or given the green light.

“It was like a bolt from the blue when this dropped through our letterboxes,” said Graham Parkinson, chairman of Burrow-with-Burrow parish meeting, which covers Cowan Bridge, with around 200 residents.

“It’s frightened us all to death and 12 months feels like a long time to wait. With 5,000 new homes you’re talking 10,000 more cars on the road.

“This is a small, farming community and there aren’t any jobs here. We think it’s a terrible idea.”

Mr Parkinson said the homes would create a town four times the size of Kirkby Lonsdale, where the idea had also been met with opposition.

Coun Janice Hanson, the city council’s cabinet mem-ber with responsibility for regeneration, said: "The option for a new rural settlement in the Lune Valley is a hypothetical one at this time.

"Having such options gives residents a wide range of choices about how to meet the new housing targets which appear to be emerging.

"If such an option were preferred, a location close to Kirby Lonsdale would ensure access to a wider range of services than in a standalone settlement.

"However, it remains important to emphasise that this is just one of a number of choices for local people to consider.

"Feedback still needs to be thoroughly evaluated and none of the options have been ranked in any prefe-rence by the council."

Comments (4)

Please log in to enable comment sorting

10:22pm Tue 12 Aug 14

Libdums says...

Labour's legacy....
Labour's legacy.... Libdums
  • Score: 0

5:33am Wed 13 Aug 14

searcher21c says...

Lancashire Council is therefore consciously looking into creating a new settlement in an area where it says the incoming population will be able to access services in a neighbouring county.

There's acceptance of responsibility for you!
Lancashire Council is therefore consciously looking into creating a new settlement in an area where it says the incoming population will be able to access services in a neighbouring county. There's acceptance of responsibility for you! searcher21c
  • Score: 4

7:10pm Wed 13 Aug 14

shirtbox says...

Great idea,wrong place ,should be twixt Grange & Kendal.With new schools,hospital,lie
sure facilities and most of all ,AFFORDABLE.
Great idea,wrong place ,should be twixt Grange & Kendal.With new schools,hospital,lie sure facilities and most of all ,AFFORDABLE. shirtbox
  • Score: -2

1:06pm Thu 14 Aug 14

PropMeUpWithTeabags says...

I think it's a good idea. I know lots of people in the area want to keep it as a tiny cluster of villages but unfortunately there are lots of people that need places to live. Trouble is they build awful cardboard houses that are too small and too expensive. They are often given to social housing organisations that do not police their houses properly and as such some tenents think they can treat their subsidised houses like crap. Big sprawlying estates don't generally work unless they cater for the rich and even then there is an estate mentality of us agai8nst them.
I think it's a good idea. I know lots of people in the area want to keep it as a tiny cluster of villages but unfortunately there are lots of people that need places to live. Trouble is they build awful cardboard houses that are too small and too expensive. They are often given to social housing organisations that do not police their houses properly and as such some tenents think they can treat their subsidised houses like crap. Big sprawlying estates don't generally work unless they cater for the rich and even then there is an estate mentality of us agai8nst them. PropMeUpWithTeabags
  • Score: -1

Comments are closed on this article.

click2find

About cookies

We want you to enjoy your visit to our website. That's why we use cookies to enhance your experience. By staying on our website you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use.

I agree