'Bedroom tax' set to hit Burnley, Pendle and Rossendale families (From Lancaster And Morecambe Citizen)
Got a Lancaster or Morecambe story? Contact us.
'Bedroom tax' set to hit Burnley, Pendle and Rossendale families
4:44pm Monday 18th March 2013 in News
By Bill Jacobs, Local government reporter
FACING A STRUGGLE: Jeanie Gentry in her Burnley home
CONTROVERSIAL ‘bedroom tax’ cuts set to hit thousands of families have been slammed as a ‘shambles’.
More than 5,000 East Lancashire social housing tenants have received letters telling them they will have to find between £14 and £25 a week extra to stay in their homes from April 1 or move to smaller properties.
A total of 5,734 letters have been sent telling tenants of social housing landlords including Twin Valley Homes, Calico, Housing Pendle and Green Vale Homes that if they are a sole tenant or couple living in a two-bedroomed home they will see their housing benefit cut by 14 per cent or by 25 per cent for a three-bedroomed property.
Two children of the same sex under 16 will have to share a bedroom and two children of any sex under ten will have to do the same under the government’s new under-occupancy regulations which take effect next month.
Major housing associations have expressed concern about the new rules impact on their tenants and Labour politicians have branded it an attack on the poor and vulnerable.
They fear there are not enough one and two bedroomed properties to accommodate those facing the new charges.
Pendle Tory MP Andrew Stephenson and Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith have defended the changes as vital to stop tenants who don’t need them having spare rooms while other families are forced to live in cramped and overcrowded accommodation in the same towns.
In Burnley 840 tenants will be affected; Rossendale 390; Pendle 600; Hyndburn 608; Ribble Valley 136; in Blackburn with Darwen 1,900 and in Chorley 900.
The new rules apply to all households where the tenant is of working age - from 16 to 61. The government has recently introduced a raft of exemptions including most foster carers; families with children serving in the armed forces and disabled people who need carers sleeping in every night - not those, such as our case study below, who need occasional overnight assistance.
Burnley Council leader Julie Cooper said: “This is a vindictive and malicious attack on the poorer and vulnerable by the government. They are forcing people to pay extra or leave their homes when there are not enough one and two bedroomed flats to go round.”
Hyndburn and Haslingden Labour MP Graham Jones said: “I do not think the Government understands the unnecessary pain this will cause. it will cause tremendous upheaval and stress and is based on the fallacy that the properties to move people into exist at all.
“There simply aren’t enough one and two bedroom homes to relocate people into.”
Rossendale Borough Labour leader Alison Barnes said: “It’s an attack on the incomes of those who cannot afford it and will cause many people misery whether they have to move or not.”
Mr Stephenson said: “We cannot allow a situation to continue where some families can’t find homes large enough to bring up their children properly while other people are subsidised for spare bedrooms they neither use or need.”
Blackburn with Darwen Labour council leader Kate Hollern described the complex concessions being introduced at a late stage as 'a shambles'.
Michael Birkett, chief executive of Calico which provides social housing in Burnley, said:”Roughly one in seven of our customers are currently under-occupying their homes; many of these are currently on very low incomes and will understandably struggle to pay the difference.”
Ian Clark, managing director of the Together Housing group, which includes Twin valley Homes in Blackburn with Darwen, Housing Pendle and Green Vale Homes in Rossendale, said: “While we can see the need to make better use of social housing stock, our concern is that with limited opportunities to downsize it will force many of our tenants to cut back on food, heating and other essentials in order to stay in their own homes.”
Case study:
Disabled Burnley woman Jeanie Gentry has to find £89 a month or move from her three-bedroomed Burnley home to a flat elsewhere in the town. The 50-year-old, who has mobility problems, is worried about losing the support from neighbours which helps her cope with life on walking sticks. She is equally concerned about finding the extra £89 she will lose for two extra bedrooms at her current home. Ms Gentry, who has lived in the property for 15 years, said: “I don’t mind moving to the right flat near my daughter so she can help me when I need someone to stay overnight. I don’t just want to be dumped in a one-bedroomed flat miles from anyone I know. “At the moment I need a spare bedroom someone sometimes has to stay with me if my mobility is bad. There is a special rail outside the house and neighbours know about my problems and help. At the moment there isn’t a suitable flat for me. I’ll really struggle to find the extra cash to stay but it would be a nightmare for me to move away from my friends to somewhere where I’m out of place.”
Comments(5)
jenkinsroy
says...
6:58am Tue 19 Mar 13
you too have more than one bedroom
free saw why are you not paying for
them tell you why 1 rule for rich and
one for poor you are now showing
your true self andrew you are not
for us just the goverment
we in lancashire only put up with so
much you have betaid us all
is the money this goverment
taking of us all going to bail out the
cyprus **** yes it is
also why???? must we all pay for a
police&crime comm? the amount of
£101.95p we did not vote in
lancashire for him
this goverment made this post up saw
they should pay him not us he will be
doing nothing for us here saw why
is the wages for this man being payed
for by being addered to our council tax
bills when you go to the house ask
them if you can becouse the incraese
in tax is just to pay for this post and his
wages and not for our benifit all of us
are paying for something we do not need
so pendle council should look into this
it is not right or needed
jenkinsroy
says...
7:15am Tue 19 Mar 13
hardship this will force on us tenants
i have only one problem
why have you put up the rents
for us when you know there is no
places to move to is this just to make
you more money or make a lote
of homeless familes move out of your
propertes do you know the money
the rent increas could have help
us poor pay some of the bedroom
tax i wish you would fink before
you put up the rents why not do
something about NOW NOW TRY
thank you a tenant of housing pendle
i like where i live do you where you
live
ROBERTSLUMDWELLER123
says...
3:21pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Morag Crump
says...
3:24pm Tue 19 Mar 13
ROBERTSLUMDWELLER123 wrote:They are all the same Robert, no matter which political party... Everyone of them are trained liars !
STEPHENSON IS NOTHING BUT A LYING TWO FACED HYPOCRITE,,I E MAILED HIM TWICE AT HIS PARLIMENTARY E MAIL ADDRESS ABOUT THIS SUBJECT AND HE TOLD ME HE DIDNT KNOW THE ANSWERS TO THE QUESTIONS I ASKED,,IE WOULD COUNCILS BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE IF THEY COULDNT SUPPLY THE FLATS ETC NEEDED,,,WOULD COUNCILS PAY FOR NEW CARPETS FURNISHINGS ETC FOR THE PEOPLE WHO MUST MOVE,,**** THAT HE IS,I HOPE THE VOTERS REMEMBER THIS SMILING ASSASSIN THE NEXT ELECTION
jeegee says...
6:55pm Mon 18 Mar 13
Jeannie Gentry